Spacex again claims to have shot up and landed a rocket into and out of "space". Looks more like special effects and hype.
In viewing a video preseneted by RUPTLY regarding what SpaceX claims is their successful rocket launch and land, I can't help but notice some wildly peculiar oddities. For example, take a look at this snapshot from the movie and look at the foil to the right of this "rocket". Foil in space? Really? Looks more like a model on earth.
Another odd thing is the white zone on the left which is a super bright white Earth, notice how it's concave and not convex. This is proof that the Earth is not round or flat but rather space is round.
Critically thinking we have to wonder was this space foil unwrapped in space on this unmanned rocket or was it there when it hurled through atmosphere at a billion miles per hour remining so smooth it "reflects" the clouds below, an effect of computer animation? It would be easy to add this effect to a stationery object on just the foil using a computer to make it look like it was moving.
Observing this obviously edited sequence of events (click on the image above to view the video on YouTube) the trained eye and ear can tell that this presentation is not exactly real unless you mean real fake. Notice how they don't show a side view of it "landing" which appears to be mere reversal of the movie sequence of it taking off.
Then there's this one below.
When you look at the shadow on the rocket shell the sun is behind the camera yet the edge here is brightly lit. Makes no sense as that would mean the sun is both behind us toward the right while also infront to the left. Simple explanation, there are two suns, or, two studio lights. Maybe it's the light from the burning fuel but where is the flame? It's not there. For it to be from "the flame" we would see the flame.
How does one know if this is computer animation or not, I mean it's like how do we prove these allegations....contact NASA? They do the same stuff, finally admitting it, so there's really no way to ever prove any of this unless you do what no man has done, go to space. We can certainly take a good look at what is being presented and question and study and vote against going to the moon for the 2nd time since we haven't been there for the first, and instead funnel those billions into helping the working class movie makers create more wonderful fantasies.
In this image from 17:59 notice the black edge of the rocket booster shell. Why is it now black? Obviously the sun set and the reason the Earth and rocket is lit is from the camera flash.
Frankly this looks like old Bugs Bunny cartoons with the black edge, and is a clear indicator of overlapping or whatever you call that. Also notice another oddity, here we have a round earth, or is it a wide angle lens that does this? Yes.
Something is also not right with the focus, "Earth" somehow is out of focus further away and in focus closer yet this is supposedly millions of miles away so focus should be the same, and the rocket shell is out of focus also. And again look at the plastic tin foil how it moves as it's being hurled through space by this rocket. OMG this is hilarious. They expect us to believe this? I guess most people don't question those in science, especially rocket science because after all it's rocket science. Also notice how when they show the rocket "landing" image next to this one, they aren't even remotely possibly presenting two views of the same thing at the same time.
And the control room excitement is obviously staged, it's too over the top melodramatic to be real.
The reporters are all acting so fake, and actually offended me. They are obviously reading the script in front of them. I guess if presidents can do it so can the rest of us but you might not want to read scripts in order to get the best movie making effect. Better films require that THE ACTORS remember and rehearse their lines and that's where you should draw the line. The other reason some of us in movie making might not want to do this type of effect though is the thing called credibility. Reporting, news, and documentaries used to be credible, providing a balance with little or no hype, but today so much of it is hype.
Other views from the SPACE found in between ears aka the imagination can be seen presented in moving image form called movies (mov - images) at the following internet addresses
Clint Eastwood new film gets the PG-13 he wanted instead of an R rating deadline.com
Filming a building in ruins can be later presented dramatically & informatively while using no narration and only adding music
the Castle from 700 years ago has trees growing out of it and no roofing remains, but the way the movie about it is edited draws the online viewer in as if they are right there in it's fantastical past glory allowing the imagination to do the restoration read more and see the movie here
Motorola gaming special edition green RAZR phone has an incredible 120mhz motion refresh rate is the best for playing movies on your phone read about it here
buy it here for Chistmas
Netflix new releases for December 2017
Movie Pass is currently offering 365 movies in theaters in one year for only $6.95 per month!
Meteor or space junk lights up the Northern Lights sky
Indie film 'Dead On Set' premiered at Liberty Hall in May 2017
Pinnacle Studio Ultimate makes ultimate iMovies
Senate tax bill allows "film", TV, and theater companies to write off the full cost of their investments their first year
Limit your use of background music in
movies you create
In this film about Mad Mike the guy in California that's planning to shoot himself in a home made rocket up a mile into "space" to see for himself if the Earth is round or flat, the film maker is using "circus music" to convey the idea of how odd it is to believe that the Earth is flat. The use of this music overlaps the interview with the interviewee so much so that it makes the movie into the circus more than the guys plan to go into "space". Don't overuse music in movies, LIMIT IT GREATLY.
Volar is a song by Jaime Ciero that is a clear rip off of the song Frozen and the author is suing everyone involved, Demi Lovato, Walt Disney Company, Idina Menzel,
even the meaning of the chorus is the same with the word fly (Volar in Spanish) being replaced with let it go. Listen for yourself to the original song Volar by Jaime Ciero.
recent releases in theatersopened 11/18
Justice League, Wonder, The Star, Roman J. Israel, Esq., The Breadwinner, Mudbound, Big Sonia, Almost Friends, Sweet Virginia, The Crime of Monsieur Lange (1936), Mr. Roosevelt
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE
All I See Is You
index of movies50 SHADES OF GREY
working on it....
in the news
Benicio Del Toro was interviewed by Dan Rather which was broadcast on TV January 19, 2016. His full name was starred in a cult following film with Johnny Depp called Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1998) which has a 7.7 rating on IMDB and is about an oddball journalist and his psychopathic lawyer who travel to Las Vegas for a series of psychopathic escapades. The name Benicio has a meaning "benevolent one". His full name is Benicio Monserrate Rafael Del Toro Sanchez. read his bio here
CALL ME BY YOUR NAME November 24, 2017
AN INCONVENIENT MOVIE REVIEW
official teaser for the Pirates of the Carribean 6 coming in 2016?
virtually any crime will be allowed to be committed as per the script for the next installment of "The Purge" as coming in October
iMovies.com and TodaysDate.com